|

|
|
Industry Solutions
Success Stories
|
|
|
Reliable Facility Monitoring with Networked Data Loggers: A White Paper
Get PDF version
How Important is Your Temperature & Humidity Data?
As important as your critical product and processes.
Veriteq's fail-safe and easy-to-install solution for temperature monitoring and humidity monitoring never loses data and never lets you down. Why? Because each data logger is powered by a 10-year battery and has on-board memory that records independantly of your network.
|
|
|
In Life Science facilities, Metrology/Calibration labs and Electronics manufacturing environments, temperature and humidity often need to be displayed for monitoring and alarmed 24/7 to safeguard products and processes. Additionally, reporting on real-time data to ensure "in-spec" performance, as well as reliable historical record keeping, is required for quality reviews and audits, as well as meeting regulatory and accreditation requisites.
Although most buildings are equipped with centralized systems for heating and air conditioning,most of these systems can't fulfill accurate, industry-specific monitoring, recording, and reporting requirements. Depending on the needs of the facility, the choices typically then come down to one or more of three basic methods: Manual "pen and paper" systems, Chart Recorders, or a secondary centralized hard-wired system.
Each of these methods offers various advantages and disadvantages particular to each industry. Consequently, facility managers often have to make difficult compromises to get the temperature monitoring system that fits both their needs and their budget.
However, systems that are based on a network or mechanical devices like chart recorders come with the inherent risks of lost and inaccurate data. Veriteq's monitoring system combines all the advantages of other methods with none of the downsides.
|
Traditional Monitoring & Data Collection Methods
|
|
Manual data collection
Surprisingly, manual humidity / temperature monitoring and data collection methods are still in wide use today. Such methods typically involve one or more operators recording initialed readings on a regular basis from a fixed read-out device (such as a digital thermometer or hygrometer). These readings are usually entered on a prominently displayed chart next to the area of interest, such as a refrigerator, freezer, or chamber.
Recording temperature and humidity readings in this manner has some obvious advantages: there is minimal equipment to purchase, there is next to nothing to maintain.
However, manual systems can be very expensive to operate and are often unreliable. Most problematic however, is the time lost to manually gathering temperature and RH data. One hospital estimated labor costs of 3,000 hours per year of valuable nursing time was taken up performing routine checks on monitored environments. The same hospital frequently had to deal with missing data that impacted their need to meet regulatory requirments. Critical products were at risk by this unreliable, error prone system of monitoring temperature and humidity.
In this instance, the risk to product increased during off-hours, when limited resources resulted in missed temperature checks. In such cases, problems can undetected for days, resulting in serious damage. For the above reasons, many Life Science facility managers can easily justify the costs of a move from manual methods to an automated system.
Chart Recorders
Chart recorders are one of the most popular ways to automatically collect and locally display data. They record and display operating data on paper charts which are then changed regularly and archived, usually on a weekly basis.
Chart recorders are relatively easy to deploy, power wiring is usually all that's required, and they have often been included as a built-in feature of various equipment. Although expensive, chart recorders are relatively simple to operate and provide local display of real-time and short-term historical data.
But for all their advantages, chart recorders are still dependent on manual processes to function properly. Charts and pens must be changed regularly or else valuable information is lost. Being mechanical devices, they cannot provide the kind of measurement accuracy that critical monitored environments require. Chart recorders are prone to periodic mechanical failures and require frequent re-calibration.
In addition, in today's increasingly "connected" world, chart recorders are now recognized as isolated devices that cannot be monitored, alarmed, or otherwise accessed remotely. This serves to make data retrieval, required when the auditors arrive, a time-consuming and tedious process.
Centralized Humidity / Temperature Monitoring Systems
Centralized monitoring (CM) systems consist of a network of remote sensors that are literally wired back to distributed or centralized input panels. Not to be confused with Building Automation Systems, a CM system is an auxiliary system tailored to the specific monitoring and reporting requirements of a particular industry.
CM systems offer many advantages including remote temperature monitoring, alarming, and reporting. By avoiding the need for manual data collection and chart replacement, such systems are a significant time-saving alternative to chart recorders and manual methods.
The main drawback to CM systems is that they are costly, prone to system-wide failures, and are limited in their ability to display localized information. A typical CM system requires expensive data acquisition equipment as well as a proprietary hard-wired network. Installation and wiring costs can often be prohibitive, particularly in older buildings. The large capital expense of such systems can also lead to a protracted budget approval process.
Centralized systems are also prone to global failures that can result in missed records and unreliable reporting. For example, system viruses, computer crashes, network failures, power outages, or operator errors can interrupt the data collection process throughout the whole system.
An often overlooked issue with CM systems is their inability to display data on a localized basis, a key requirement in many industries. Instead, data can only be viewed or retrieved at a central location.
|
Veriteq's Accurate, Autonous Solution: viewLinc
|
|
viewLinc is Veriteq's networked data logging (Net/DL)system. The viewLinc software connects to Veriteq data loggers that record autonomously and can be connected to an existing computer network for display and alarm.
Each data logger is a completely independent data collection device with integrated temperature or temperature and humidity sensors, memory, clock, and 10-year battery. The loggers interface to an existing network either through a computer on the network or through a device server.
 |
 |
Basic networked data logger system - click for a larger view |
Net/DL systems differ from conventional centralized monitoring systems in that they employ a highly distributed architecture. While each module is independent and capable of collecting data on its own - without reliance on a network or power connection - it's data is also highly accessible - on a historical and real-time basis - to permit central monitoring and alarming. This architecture makes Net/DL systems exceptionally easy to install, scalable, accessible, reliable, and cost-effective. The following summary discusses these points further:
Easy, Scalable & Smart
A key advantage of Veriteq's viewLinc system is how easily, quickly, and inexpensively the data loggers can be deployed and later expanded as required by the needs of your monitored environment. Start small and grow a system gradually, avoiding the delay of approving large capital expenditures. With the added technology of OPC servers, data loggers can even connect to other Windows based monitoring systems.
The system is easily scalable according to user requirements, from a single data logger and workstation location to a system of an unlimited number of data loggers and multiple monitoring stations. In addition, Net/DL systems are flexible: modules can be easily relocated without difficulty, allowing measurements to be taken precisely at the area of interest, rather than on a distant lab wall.
Centralized vs Distributed Monitoring & Alarming
Centralized monitoring saves operational costs and guarantees better system operation, as monitoring can be more easily carried out by a smaller number of dedicated personnel. Net/DL systems have the same advantages as hard-wired centralized monitoring systems: remote monitoring, alarm notification, automatic data collection and archiving.
However, because our system uses your existing LAN, information can be easily disseminated at each workstation rather than only at a central location. In addition, viewLinc can be easily interfaced with the network's e-mail system to deliver alarm messages and status information remotely.
Redundant Data Storage
Each Veriteq data logger records redundantly, collecting and storing data in the on-board memory. This is crucial in applications where missing data can have expensive consequences. With viewLinc, not only is data collected locally and independently within each data logger, the data is regularly backed up across the network to one or more remote locations. Even if your whole network is down or if there is a power outage, you'll never lose data.
Efficient Data Retrieval
With the viewLinc Net/DL system you can set up automatic regular downloads of data logger information to one or more central locations. This data then is safely archived and accessible and can be used to create detailed reports on demand.
Cost-Effectiveness
Throughout the system, user-friendliness, reliability, scalability, and network accessibility are the key factors that reduce the running costs and give a higher return of investment for Net/DL systems. In addition, most users also have discovered that Net/DL systems are very affordable, since companies already have many components of the system in place (such as a Local Area Network and existing PC's).
|
The no-compromise solution
|
|
When it comes to deciding on the monitoring and data collection needs of your facility, choosing an appropriate type of monitoring system involves a number of factors and compromises. Such compromises include initial cost, operating costs, implementation schedule, and functionality.
However, with the emergence of Net/DL technology, many of these compromises need never be made. A new technology that effectively leverages networks, the Net/DL system provides flexibility, fast installation, suberb accuracy and total reliability.
|
|